Are you a fan of the TV show CSI? Well although the working practices of the CSI teams may be unrealistic, we can vouch that when it comes to wood forensics, they’ve got their facts just about right.
Take CSI: New York, series 5, episode 13 that was aired in early 2009. In this case, the lead investigator finds saw-dust on the body and at the crime scene which is sent to the lab for testing in the hope that they can determine where the wood came from. Unfortunately, the lab advises that “the DNA from the tree contains endogenous chemicals that inhibit analysis.” Well they’re right, and that’s exactly the challenge we face here at Double Helix Tracking Technologies! Why is DNA extraction from wood so complicated even when scientists routinely extract DNA from human bodies?
DNA in a living tree trunk, unlike other parts of plants or parts of the human body, starts to die and degrade whilst the tree is still standing and growing. A tree trunk has three parts: outer bark, inner bark (called the cambium) and the heartwood. Whilst the heartwood is used in timber products such as furniture, decking and floors etc., it is also the dead part of the tree.
When a cell is dead, its DNA begins to degrade. It loses its structure and the DNA strands start to break up. Imagine DNA as a huge piece of paper with a complex code written on it. Degraded DNA is like the same piece of paper passed through a highly efficient shredder. The information is still there but very fragmented.
Leaving the actual identification of the DNA aside, the first challenge is for a scientist to extract the DNA. In a human or animal this is fairly easy to do this with standard laboratory chemicals. You could even extract your own DNA with salt and soap water! Wood is much more complicated because of the presence of chemicals such as Tannin. Tannin adversely reacts with the conventional chemicals used for DNA extraction, even stumping our friends at the crime lab. So one of our tasks is to develop new extraction protocols especially for wood.
Once the DNA is successfully extracted, the next challenge is to do the actual DNA test. Fortunately we do not need to know every bit of information in that paper to complete a test. We only need to identify certain key words. In DNA lingo these key words are called ‘genetic markers’.
In a human paternity test, a laboratory may use between 8 and 13 such markers to verify a relationship. We have to find similar markers for every species of tree that we intend to verify and ensure these same markers can be extracted and identified from the dead wood.
All this and more makes wood DNA analysis extremely challenging. These are precisely the challenges the we are tackling in our own research and soon we will be able to provide the DNA evidence to back up the CSI team, at least when wood is involved.
P.S. Luckily for the CSI in the saw-dust episode, they were able to identify the species of tree, which just happened to grow in only one location in the whole of New York. Doh!